The US Presidential Candidates 2020

We regret that time and resources do not allow us to engage in exchanges about particular placements.

The Political Compass is a universal tool, applicable to all western democracies. It shows the whole potential political landscape, not simply one within the confines of any particular country. For example, Bernie Sanders is popularly perceived in his own country as an off-the-wall left figure; in other western democracies he would sit squarely within the mainstream social democratic parties that regularly form governments or comprise the largest opposition. Conversely, a US candidate who believes in unfettered market forces or capital punishment may be seen at home as mainstream, but ‘extreme’ in other developed countries. Similarly, ‘Obamacare’ is seen as a liberal/left initiative in the US, while in other developed countries it is viewed as a tepid version of the long-established universal public health care systems that are broadly supported by conservatives as well as social democrats.

In the crowded field of candidates in the US 2020 primaries, there are some interesting clusters of attitudes. For example only nine candidates are opposed to increases to the military budget, including some who are nevertheless also against foreign intervention. Some with a strong commitment to countering climate change nevertheless uphold an equally strong commitment to unlimited economic growth, and sometimes even to the further deregulation of corporate polluters.

We have analysed speeches, manifestos and, crucially, voting records in the compilation of this chart. There are three instances where we were unable to find any opinions on record for a significant number of important issues. It is therefore so far not possible to properly place Messam, Steyer or Amash. In the light of further information, they will, of course, be included. As the campaign proceeds, the chart will be amended to reflect policy changes and other relevant developments.

The Democratic camp offers a more interesting diversity of ideologies than usual, with their most libertarian left candidates clearly more at home with Green Party policies. With the exception of Weld, there are few significant differences between Republican candidates. Weld, like the Libertarian Party’s Vohra, has an especially strongly-held libertarian outlook on the economic scale.

While the Democratic outcome, especially with the emergence of billionaire Steyer, may be surprising, the successful Republican is a foregone conclusion. The big surprise is that a majority of Christian fundamentalists favour the candidate that Jesus would almost certainly be least likely to choose.